A Simple Trust
A trust is simple. A
trust can have many pages, or a half a paragraph. You write it, you get to make the rules. Good thing.
And bad, too. Sometimes it is
like Captain Picard on Star Trek saying, “Make it so.” But sometimes it is like explaining to a
precocious 6 year old how the moon sometimes orbits the sun faster than the
earth does and sometimes slower.
So why make a trust complicated and long? Why make any deal complicated and long? How about the deal we make every time we log
onto a website and download something?
Even when it is free? Yeah. Long and complicated. And a trust agreement probably should be too.
But why? What law
says it has to be long?
Well, you see, there is no law. The law is that a trust agreement is exactly
what you say it is. There are no rules that fill in the blanks we do not cover
in the writing.
Most contracts are different. There are millions of rules for contracts. We all make contracts almost every day, and
many times a day. As a matter of fact
you can make a binding contract without saying a word. Two people, standing silently and perhaps even
with no eye contact, can make a deal.
One party silently makes an offer to pay $.45 for a can of beans, by
placing a can of beans on a table or counter.
The other silently agrees to accept the offer and to deliver the can of
beans to the buyer by sliding the can of beans past a scanner. The buyer then hands over the funds in
satisfaction of the buyer’s agreed obligations and the seller fulfills the
contract for delivery of goods to the buyer by placing the can of beans in the
paper sack, or perhaps by placing the can onto the second part of the grocery
store checkout counter. Thousands of
such deals are made every day, all across our nation.
Such a contract is binding and legally enforceable. The buyer who takes the can of beans but
fails to pay can be sued in court and can also be prosecuted for theft. The seller who fails to hand over the can of
beans after the buyer has paid the agreed purchase price can also be sued for
breach of contract and can be charged with theft.
But how can that be?
The answer is that there are a multitude of statutes, enacted by our
legislature, that fill in all the blanks in the contract agreement. The Uniform Commercial Code verbalizes many
of the rules. Court decisions in various
circumstances help guide us in the rest of the blanks. The UCC tells us that if a buyer offers a
particular price for a tangible moveable thing, and if the seller agrees by a
clear indication that he or she accepts the offer, and if the buyer hands over
the money or promises to hand over the money, then the parties have made an
enforceable contract. For things that
are not moveable, like land, other rules step in. They are generally found in court decisions,
but some of the rules are written in statutes, especially if they relate to
real estate.
But there are very few such rules to fill in the blanks for
trust agreements. A trust agreement is like
a “three-legged stool.” One person,
usually someone who owns something, (who we will call the Grantor) hands that
thing over to a second party (who we will call the Trustee) but does not really
give away the thing to the trustee.
Instead the Grantor tells the Trustee to do something with the thing for
the benefit of some third party (who we will call the Beneficiary). The instruction the Grantor gives the Trustee
is the trust agreement. The agreement
could simply tell the trustee to keep a can of beans from freezing and to give
the can of beans to the Beneficiary at supper time, or in two weeks, or two
years.
But sometimes the can of beans is really a million dollars
or a house or half of the Grantor’s Estate when the Grantor dies. Perhaps the deal is that the trustee will be
allowed to spend the money on college education for the beneficiary but only if
there is enough cash left to pay the real estate tax on the house and only if
the beneficiary is getting A’s and B’s in college and only if the beneficiary
is at least 17 years old, etc. So you
can see how the deal for a pile of beans can get more complicated. But there just is no standard rule to fill in
the blanks about A’s versus B’s and no magic rule about age 17 versus age 16. So the trustee needs more instructions.
So you can see that a trust agreement has to be long enough to
make the plan clear. A good lawyer works
hard to make the instructions in the trust agreement easy to understand and to
deal with all the questions that may not be obvious now but which may become
critically important in the future. Some
rules, such as tax rules and real estate rules and surviving spousal protection
rules, must necessarily affect the instructions in the trust agreement. So the lawyer must at least be aware of the
choices the grantor has and perhaps should decide now. Alternatively, the trust agreement should
give the trustee power to decide the question when the question arises.
Of course, there are some trust agreements that just cannot
be enforced. For instance, if the
grantor tells the trustee to use the money to hire a hitman to kill the grantor’s
evil son-in-law, no court can force the trustee to perform that trust
agreement. We just cannot legally make
deals to kill people. Perhaps a more
legal but equally unenforceable trust would instruct the trustee to give all of
the Grantor’s money to Grantor’s grandchildren but there are never born any
grandchildren. So the lawyer must assist
the Grantor in deciding what should be said and what to add to the instructions
in case the plan does not work out as planned.
Finally, the trust agreement must give the trustee power to
control at least some property, some asset, perhaps at least one dollar. If the trustee has nothing to control for the
grantor, then there is nothing the trustee can do, so there is no trust deal.
One of the purposes of many trusts is to help avoid the need
to use a probate process to transfer the grantor’s assets to the grantor’s
heirs at grantor’s death. In that case,
it is important to make sure that the grantor gives the trustee ownership
rights in all of grantor’s assets, including real estate, moveable tangible
personal property like a car or a couch and all of grantor’s intangible
property like bank accounts.
Occasionally, a significant asset is overlooked, or the grantor acquires
a significant asset but fails to transfer it to the trustee before death. In that case the grantor’s estate might have
to be probated. So the Grantor’s will
must state what should happen to such an asset.
Often, the grantor’s will merely directs that the asset be transferred
to the trustee and be included in the assets controlled by the trust. We call that kind of a will a “pour-over
will.” So. Sometimes we need documents
in addition to the trust to accomplish the desires of the grantor.
So, trusts are simple.
All you need to do is to say what you want.
Witte Law Office